Marvell v. Wi-LAN (California)

Marvell v. Wi-LAN (Northern District of California)

Date Details Documentation
June 19, 2008 U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston issues an order dismissing, with prejudice, the Complaint of Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. for Declaratory Relief and requiring that each party shall bear its own costs and expenses of this litigation. Marvell Dismissal Order 

June 19, 2008

Wi-LAN and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. file a Joint Stipulated Notice of Dismissal [Proposed] Order to dismiss this action.


Joint Stipulated Notice of Dismissal (proposed) Order 

June 18, 2008

United States District Judge Susan Illston issues Order granting Marvell Semiconductor Inc.’s Motion to File Surreply.


Order Granting Marvell's Motion to File Surreply 
June 17, 2008 Wi-LAN files its Opposition to Marvell’s Motion for Leave to file Surreply. Wi-LAN's Opposition to Marvell's Motion for Leave to file Surreply

June 13, 2008

Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. files motion seeking leave to file a Surreply in response to Wi-LAN’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Marvell’s Suit for Declaratory Relief.


Marvell's Motion for Leave to File Surreply re: Motion to Dismiss 

Exhibit A - Marvell's Surreply re: Motion to Dismiss  

June 6, 2008

Wi-LAN files its Redacted Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Marvell Suit for Declaratory Relief


REDACTED Wi-LAN's Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss  

Exhibit A to Reply 

May 30, 2008

Marvell Semiconductor Inc. files its Opposition to Wi-LAN Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Marvell’s Suit for Declaratory Relief. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston orders that Marvell’s full brief and supporting materials be filed under seal as “confidential”. Only the redacted form of the Opposition and supporting Declaration are available for public viewing.


REDACTED Marvell's Opposition to Wi-LAN's Motion to Dismiss 

Order Sealing Documents 

REDACTED Declaration of Krishnamurthy in Support of Opp to Motion to Dismiss

May 9, 2008

U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston ordered the continuance of Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss the Marvell Complaint to June 20, 2008, and further ordered the continuance of the initial case management conference to July 25, 2008 and that a joint case management conference statement shall be filed one week in advance of the conference.


Order Continuing Motion to Dismiss Hearing 

Order Motion to Dismiss and Case Management Conference 

May 8, 2008

Wi-LAN and Marvell file joint Stipulation seeking to vacate the May 30, 2008 initial Case Management Conference and to have the Court reset the initial Case Management Conference to a later date following the June 13, 2008 hearing date for Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss the Marvell DJ action.


Stipulation and Proposed Order

May 7, 2008

Wi-LAN files a Notice of Continuance changing the hearing date from May 30, 2008 to June 13, 2008 for Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss Marvell Semiconductor Inc.’s Suit for Declaratory Relief.


Notice by Wi-LAN of Continuance of Hearing  

May 6, 2008

Wi-LAN files a Notice of Continuance changing the hearing date from May 23, 2008 to May 30, 2008 for Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss Marvell Semiconductor Inc.’s Suit for Declaratory Relief.


Notice by Wi-LAN of Continuance of Hearing 

April 3, 2008

Wi-LAN files motion to dismiss Marvell Semiconductor Inc.’s suit for declaratory relief. The motion is currently scheduled to be heard on May 23, 2008.


Wi-LAN's Motion to Dismiss 

March 14, 2008

District Court Judge Illston orders that Wi-LAN’s pleading in response to the Complaint must be filed on or before March 31, 2008.


Marvell Signed Stipulation Order
 
January 24, 2008 The Court ordered that the case be reassigned to the San Francisco division under the supervision of the Honorable Judge Susan Illston. Reassignment Order
November 5, 2007 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. files Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Northern District of California.  Wi-LAN will deliver its response to this action within the time limits prescribed by the Court. Complaint for Declaratory Relief