4 Causes Why Python Should not Be the Prime Programming Language

Situations have hardly ever been greater for Python. The language now ranks as the most common programming language in the world, according to the TIOBE Index — a posture that demonstrates a long time of regular growth in excess of the previous two decades.

That expansion stems from a wide variety of components. 1 is the fact that Python — despite its humble origins as an enhanced shell scripting language — has progressed into just one of the most functional, dynamic languages out there. It’s utilized for every little thing from internet advancement, to internet of items (IoT) programming, to AI and past. Yet another is that Python code is really uncomplicated to create and execute, which would make Python a language of selection for introductory programming courses. Mainly every person who can take Coding 101 at faculty, or attends a coding bootcamp, these days learns Python.

Nonetheless, portion of me miracles how long Python’s heyday will past. Although there is certainly undoubtedly very little inherently mistaken with the language, I’m in some approaches stunned that it has managed to develop into as well known as it has, and I am a little bit uncertain about whether Python will continue being a top programming language 10 or 20 many years from now.

Why, you question? Perfectly, in this article are four factors why Python is arguably much more preferred than it justifies to be.

1. Python Is Not Quick

Arguably the programming language’s most significant shortcoming is that applications published in Python are just not rapidly. At minimum, they’re not just about as quickly as people coded in languages like C or even Java (which is itself not an in particular speedy language).

For this reason, I stress that we’re shooting ourselves in the foot a little bit by writing so a lot code in Python. The code might be effortless to create and deploy, but we are sacrificing velocity, performance, and overall performance. In a environment where by every single millisecond counts, Python is just not a good decision.


2. Python’s Syntax Is Too Rigid

Portion of the motive Python is so common, particularly among people today more recent to coding, is that it demands a really distinct syntax. That syntax transpires to end result in code that is quite neat and readable.

This is wonderful if you never mind taking the time to comply with all of Python’s syntactic policies. But if you just want to churn out code speedily, Python is likely not the finest language.

So, if we want to prioritize adaptability and dynamism about possessing everyone’s code glance pretty rather and dependable, Python is not the finest language for the future.

3. Python Presents a Restricted Programming Knowledge

One more aspect of the explanation why Python is well known with newcomers is that it can be uncomplicated to use. You really don’t have to pass your code via a compiler.

The draw back of Python in this respect, nonetheless, is that it does not in fact give a holistic software improvement knowledge. Men and women who find out to code in Python are not understanding about each individual element of a common software package enhancement pipeline, and they will deal with a discovering curve if they go on to perform with languages that are not interpreted.

In fact — and this could audio a minimal severe — knowing how to code in Python is simply a person action up from knowing how to run plans in a Bash shell, which is not coding at all.

From this viewpoint, you could argue that Python is building a generation of programmers who do not always know “finish” programming. They just know how to publish interpreted code.

4. Practically nothing Really Huge Has Been Penned in Python

This statement may perhaps also put me in some sizzling h2o, but I will go forward and make it: As I look around the globe these days, I never see any definitely massive, sophisticated, momentous programs or platforms created in Python.

Certain, there are a lot of big websites that use Python in a person way or another, mostly on the back again finish. And there are probably tens of millions of more compact applications out there designed in Python.

But there is no Python-centered equal to WordPress (although there are some Python-dependent CMSes out there, most of which you have most likely not listened to of). There is no office productivity suite that is dependent greatly on Python. There is surely no operating method, or even a big portion of an functioning method, coded in Python.

This observation isn’t really a criticism of Python as a lot as it can be an work to highlight the simple fact that, if Python were being poised to stay a major programming language for a long time to arrive, you would think a person would have completed a little something a lot more interesting with it by now than produce scripts and basic apps. But they have not, and they likely will not likely.


Admittedly, the arguments I’ve built over in opposition to Python are all subjective and undoubtedly pretty debatable. A lot of men and women are more bullish about Python than me.

And I’m not expressing that Python should really by no means be made use of. It surely has valid use circumstances. But all those use instances mainly involve producing fairly very simple scripts and purposes, not hoping to use Python as the go-to language for creating every thing under the sunshine.

Soon after all, as I said higher than, Python was created at first to be mainly just a shell scripting language. It has morphed into a much far more well-liked type of monster, and I consider that development will prove to be an anomaly. Ten many years from now, I suspect we are going to be seeking back and questioning what we were being considering when we produced Python the most common programming language in the world.

Related posts