Matter – OfdmFORUM

Darkish Matter Television Facts Its Backbone-Tingling Horror Programming for ‘Darktober’

October 29, 2023 Audrey

As the witching hour attracts in close proximity to, Dim Issue Tv, the streaming channel for horror and style fans, is established to send chills down the spines of thrill-searching for viewers with its bone-chilling Halloween party. This thirty day period, Dim Issue Television invitations horror aficionados, concern fanatics, and adrenaline junkies to embark on a sinister journey into the depths of horror leisure with Darktober.

Darktober Details

The thirty day period, acknowledged as Darktober, claims a thirty day period-lengthy fiesta of frights, featuring unique new film and tv programming, fascinating social media contests and giveaways, and an array of participating activations designed for all horror lovers.

Here’s a sample of what’s on this thirty day period.

RE-ANIMATOR (1985): A horror/comedy exactly where a professional medical student brings his headless professor again from the dead with a exclusive serum. Starring Jeffrey Combs, Bruce Abbott, and Barbara Crampton.

AUDITION (1999): A Japanese horror/thriller where by a widower will take an offer you to display girls at a unique audition, arranged for him by a mate to locate him a new spouse. However, the a person he fancies is not who she appears to be following all.

THE SLAYER (1982): Two couples grow to be stranded on a rugged isle, and are haunted by a supernatural beast, drawn to the wife of one of the couples, who dreams of its killings. Starring Sarah Kendall, Frederick Flynn, Alan McRae, and Carol Kottenbrook.

Mind Hurt (1988): A horror/comedy the place a youthful guy wakes 1 morning to find that a little, disgusting creature has attached alone to the base of his brain stem. The creature offers him a euphoric point out of joy, but requires human victims in return.

RINGU (1998): The notorious Japanese horror/thriller that impressed Gore Verbinski’s ‘The Ring’. A reporter and her ex-husband investigate a cursed videotape that is rumored to eliminate the viewer 7 days following seeing it.

BLACK BOX: A new anthology series created by Tom Sokalski. 5, 50 %-hour episodes discovering futuristic technology, apocalyptic worlds, and sci-fi horrors. Episodes incorporate “Gearhead”, “Ignorance”, “Obliteration”, “Godmachine”, and “Quarantine”.

Educate TO BUSAN: A 95% qualified fresh™ cult common that provides a thrillingly exceptional get on the zombie style.

THE WAILING: A 99% accredited fresh™ South Korean horror/mystery. A mysterious illness spreads shortly soon after a stranger comes in a minor village. A policeman, drawn into the incident, is forced to resolve the mystery to help save his daughter.

THE GOLEM: A chillingly helpful horror story rooted in loaded folklore, blending generations-outdated stories with well timed themes. In the course of an outbreak of a deadly plague in Lithuania, a mystical woman ought to preserve her tight-knit Jewish local community from a gang of ruffians led by a area landowner, but the entity she conjures to defend them is a far bigger evil.

COURTNEY Will get POSSESSED: A quickly-to-be cult classic horror/comedy from directors Madison Hatfield and Jono Mitchell. Best Neighborhood Feature Winner at the 2022 Atlanta Horror Film Festival. Releasing on

AI-Based Prose Programming for Subject Matter Experts: Will This Work?

August 25, 2023 Audrey

Key Takeaways

Recent advances in prose-to-code generation via Large Language Models (LLMs) will make it practical for non-programmers to “program in prose” for practically useful program complexities, a long-standing dream of computer scientists and subject-matter experts alike.

Assuming that correctness of the code and explainability of the results remain important, testing the code will still have to be done using more traditional approaches. Hence, the non-programmers must understand the notion of testing and coverage.

Program understanding, visualization, exploration, and simulation will become even more relevant in the future to illustrate what the generated program does to subject matter experts.

There is a strong synergy with very high-level programming languages and domain-specific languages (DSLs) because the to-be-generated programs are shorter (and less error prone) and more directly aligned with the execution semantics (and therefore easier to understand).

I think it is still an open question how far the approach scales and how integrated tools will look that exploit both LLMs’ “prose magic” and more traditional ways of computing. I illustrate this with an open-source demonstrator implemented in JetBrains MPS.

Introduction

As a consequence of AI, machine learning, neural networks, and in particular Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, there’s a discussion about the future of programming. There are mainly two areas. One focuses on how AI can help developers code more efficiently. We have probably all asked ChatGPT to generate small-ish fragments of code from prose descriptions and pasted them into whatever larger program we were developing. Or used Github Copilot directly in our IDEs.

This works quite well because, as programmers, we can verify that the code makes sense just by looking at it or trying it out in a “safe” environment. Eventually (or even in advance), we write tests to validate that the generated code works in all relevant scenarios. And the AI-generated code doesn’t even have to be completely correct because it is useful to developers if it reaches 80% correctness. Just like when we look up things on Stackoverflow, it can serve as an inspiration/outline/guidance/hint to allow the programmer to finish the job manually. I think it is indisputable that this use of AI provides value to developers.

The second discussion area is whether this will enable non-programmers to instruct computers. The idea is that they just write a prompt, and the AI generates code that makes the machine do whatever they intended. The key difference to the previous scenario is that the inherent safeguards against generated nonsense aren’t there, at least not obviously.

A non-programmer user can’t necessarily look at the code and check it for plausibility, they can’t necessarily bring a generated 80% solution to 100%, and they don’t necessarily write tests. So will this approach work, and how must languages and tools change to make it work? This is the focus of this article.

Why not use AI directly?

You might ask: why generate programs in the first place? Why don’t we just use a general-purpose AI