Ayad Akhtar: AI Ad Tech Is Warping Our Minds

illustration of a page of book text covered with pop-up windows saying "subscribe," "learn more," "buy now" and pixellated arrows
Paul Spella / The Atlantic

This essay has been adapted from a lecture delivered at the Newark Public Library in honor of Philip Roth.

Something unnatural is afoot. Our affinities are increasingly no longer our own, but rather are selected for us for the purpose of automated economic gain. The automation of our cognition and the predictive power of technology to monetize our behavior, indeed our very thinking, is transforming not only our societies and discourse with one another, but also our very neurochemistry. It is a late chapter of a larger story, about the deepening incursion of mercantile thinking into the groundwater of our philosophical ideals. This technology is no longer just shaping the world around us, but actively remaking us from within.

From our December 2021 issue

Check out the full table of contents and find your next story to read.

See More

That we are subject to the dominion of endless digital surveillance is not news. And yet, the sheer scale of the domination continues to defy our imaginative embrace. Virtually everything we do, everything we are, is transmuted now into digital information. Our movements in space, our breathing at night, our expenditures and viewing habits, our internet searches, our conversations in the kitchen and in the bedroom—all of it observed by no one in particular, all of it reduced to data parsed for the patterns that will predict our purchases.

But the model isn’t simply predictive. It influences us. Daniel Kahneman’s seminal work in behavioral psychology has demonstrated the effectiveness of unconscious priming. Whether or not you are aware that you’ve seen a word, that word affects your decision making. This is the reason the technology works so well. The regime of screens that now comprises much of the surface area of our daily cognition operates as a delivery system for unconscious priming. Otherwise known as advertising technology, this is the system behind the website banners, the promotions tab in your Gmail, the Instagram Story you swipe through, the brand names glanced at in email headings, the words and images insinuated between posts in feeds of various sorts. The ads we don’t particularly pay attention to shape us more than we know, part of the array of the platforms’ sensory stimuli, all working in concert to adhere us more completely.

Adhesiveness. That’s what the technology aspires to achieve, the metric by which it self-regulates and optimizes. The longer we stick around—on YouTube or Facebook, on Amazon, on the New York Times app—the deeper we scroll, the greater the yield of information, the more effective the influence. We are only starting to understand just how intentional all of this is, just how engineered for maximum engagement the platforms are. In fact, the platforms have been built, and are still being optimized, to keep us glued, to keep us engaged.

Read More

‘Our notion of privacy will be useless’: what happens if technology learns to read our minds? | Technology

“The skull functions as a bastion of privacy the brain is the very last private section of ourselves,” Australian neurosurgeon Tom Oxley says from New York.

Oxley is the CEO of Synchron, a neurotechnology firm born in Melbourne that has effectively trialled hi-tech brain implants that let people today to deliver email messages and texts purely by assumed.

In July this 12 months, it became the 1st company in the globe, forward of rivals like Elon Musk’s Neuralink, to obtain acceptance from the US Meals and Drug Administration (Fda) to carry out scientific trials of brain computer interfaces (BCIs) in people in the US.

Synchron has by now effectively fed electrodes into paralysed patients’ brains by using their blood vessels. The electrodes record mind action and feed the knowledge wirelessly to a laptop or computer, where it is interpreted and applied as a set of instructions, making it possible for the people to deliver emails and texts.

BCIs, which make it possible for a individual to regulate a unit via a relationship concerning their brain and a pc, are observed as a gamechanger for persons with specific disabilities.

“No just one can see inside of your mind,” Oxley suggests. “It’s only our mouths and bodies moving that tells persons what is within our mind … For men and women who can’t do that, it’s a horrific scenario. What we’re doing is seeking to support them get what’s inside of their cranium out. We are absolutely concentrated on solving clinical troubles.”

BCIs are a single of a array of building systems centred on the brain. Mind stimulation is an additional, which delivers specific electrical pulses to the mind and is made use of to address cognitive conditions. Other folks, like imaging tactics fMRI and EEG, can monitor the brain in actual time.

“The probable of neuroscience to improve our life is virtually unrestricted,” states David Grant, a senior exploration fellow at the College of Melbourne. “However, the amount of intrusion that would be desired to realise these gains … is profound”.

Grant’s problems about neurotech are not with the perform of firms like Synchron. Controlled professional medical corrections for people with cognitive and sensory handicaps are uncontroversial, in his eyes.

But what, he asks, would happen if these kinds of capabilities shift from medicine into an unregulated business environment? It is a dystopian state of affairs that Grant predicts would lead to “a progressive and relentless deterioration of our potential to management our very own brains”.

And when it’s a development that remains hypothetical, it is not unthinkable. In some countries, governments are by now shifting to defend individuals from the risk.

A new style of legal rights

In 2017 a youthful European bioethicist, Marcello Ienca, was anticipating these likely hazards. He proposed a new class of authorized legal rights: neuro legal rights, the freedom to make a decision who is permitted to watch, read through or change your brain.

Nowadays Ienca is a Professor of Bioethics at ETH Zurich in

Read More